Less Money for Better Healthcare

According to recent studies, only 11 per cent of our health is determined by medical care, with 21 per cent being determined by genetics and biology, 23 per cent by social circumstances and 38 per cent by individual behaviour. This indicates that much of the costs being absorbed by healthcare aren’t creating better outcomes for our health. So with higher premiums and taxes and lower wages, the benefits we’re receiving aren’t justified.

Image Credit

With the Affordable Care Act (ACA) looking to be replaced by Trump and Congress, they should perhaps be focusing on what’s driving this excessive spending, such as comprehensive health insurance. In doing this, Trump can then, to the best of his ability, deliver what he promised: “great healthcare for much less money”.  A great way we are saving money is by being efficient and getting products made in bulk in warehouses with Injection Moulding technology out of quality materials.  One way to get an idea of how this is done you could looking at sites similar to meadex.co.uk/services/#injection-moulding.

Too Many Expenses

One of the major problems with the ACA is the fact that comprehensive health insurance is a requirement. With few people being excluded from this, all individual and employer market plans must meet a growing number of demands. Not only that, but there are also huge administrative costs involved in this too.

A lot of the people who gained coverage were included in the Medicaid program, which offers many benefits. The expansion of this programme has created a lot of additional expenses in healthcare, providing few benefits to many of its enrollees. For example, the cost per enrollee is nearly 50% above the original estimates, whilst Dartmouth, Harvard and MIT economists estimate that for each $1 spent on their behalf in Medicaid, they receive just 20 to 40 cents’ worth.

Removal of the ACA

Because reduced choices, higher taxes and higher premiums, along with a complicated individual insurance market, haven’t been justified by the ACA, many believe that it should be repealed. Ideally, it should then be replaced by something that reduces the pressure on prices whilst increasing the quality of healthcare provided. This may provide more money for companies to hire a contract research organization who can help develop innovative vaccines and medications.

Through the ACA, Medicaid and Medicare and employer-sponsored insurance tax exclusions, the federal government is providing subsidies for comprehensive health insurance worth over $1 trillion each year. These tend to be delivered straight to hospitals or insurance companies. And financial outcomes would be better if this was given straight to consumers and those producing medications.

Author: Richard Brown

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *